It isn’t always sunny in Vancouver

A view of downtown Vancouver, British Columbia, looking across Coal Harbour from Stanley Park on Sunday, March 22, 2026.
A view of downtown Vancouver, British Columbia, looking across Coal Harbour from Stanley Park on Sunday, March 22, 2026.

I visited the Pacific Northwest in March as part of a curling trip to Vancouver, British Columbia. I wasn’t sure what to expect, but I was prepared for it to be cool and damp.

My initial travel to the area from Seattle to Vancouver seemed to confirm my suspicions — there was light drizzle in Seattle and that seemed to continue when my train arrived at Pacific Central Station.

First impressions can be deceiving. After that first night back in Canada, there was nothing but sunshine and mostly moderate temperatures until I took the bus back to the grey gloom of Seattle.

Take a look at one of my early Vancouver photos and one as I was leaving four days later.

It was my first visit to Western Canada. Vancouver impressed me on nearly every level as a cosmopolitan city akin to San Francisco or Seattle with distinct and gorgeous landscapes from Queen Elizabeth Park to Stanley Park. They also seem to be big on rooftop patios and gardens, which I found to be delightful.

Despite my mostly positive impression, there were three events that reminded me that not everything is perfect. While one event may have been the result of long-term societal issues, I don’t view my experience as some sort of indictment against how the city or province are governed.

One was an indirect interaction on my last night in the city. I was on the hunt for some interesting seafood and I initially headed toward the east side of the city via bus before I realized I didn’t really want to go to that specific restaurant.

Seeking to head back downtown, I hopped off the bus on Hastings Street near Main Street and crossed the street to catch a westbound bus.

Hastings Street unfortunately had signs of abject poverty and homelessness that were largely absent in the other parts of the city I visited. The number of people apparently living permanently in tents on the street was to the point where I felt uncomfortable as nighttime fell. I would probably not want to bring friends or family without precautions.

I will note that no one approached me, so I can’t say how the people were. I was also briefly tempted to check out one establishment that was running a karaoke night.

On another day, I was waiting for a bus after visiting a currency exchange. As I was sitting on a bus bench while wearing a USA Curling ballcap, a man sat down next to me and very shortly thereafter asked “Why don’t you go back to the United States?”

My response was pretty simple: “I was invited to be here” for the curling event.

After that brusque introduction, the man reflected that he had dual citizenship between Canada and the United States but he didn’t have a U.S. passport. It also turned out that the mother’s side of his family was from northern Utah, and he seemed to harbor a little bitterness toward his late mother for bringing her family to Canada. I was sympathetic, especially as there are things that we would want to say to a loved one but couldn’t when they were alive.

Eventually the bus arrived and we boarded at the same time.

Given his other interaction on the bus (loudly asking if a bus pass he found belonged to anyone), this man appeared to be a little awkward in public but seemed harmless. I could envision myself in his shoes to a point.

The third incident that stood out was when I riding another bus (or maybe SkyTrain). A man in front of me sneezed about three times.

After the first time, I said “Bless you.” After the second sneeze, I said “You only get one,” in a dumb reference to a “Family Guy” joke that got a laugh once so I keep trying it from time to time. I said “Bless you” again after the man’s third sneeze.

However, the man didn’t seem comforted, repeatedly saying that it was “too late” for him. He sounded down, and I was at a loss for words.

While “Bless you” generally implies the invocation of God or similar deity, that was uncomfortable ground for me to stay on in my response to this person who seemed to be in need. While many faiths assert that it’s never too late to find salvation with their deity, I didn’t feel it was my place to make such a claim.

My response was something along the lines of “We can wish each other goodwill.”

That response seemed incomplete but it was the first thing that came to mind.

Even if one doesn’t believe in a superior being, I found it deeply sad for someone to believe it’s “too late” to find some sort of grace, acceptance, redemption or just peace in this world.

If I had a second chance to speak with this man, I would’ve said that it was never “too late” to find some purpose or fulfillment in life.

A couple of quotes bolster my line of thought, including Teddy Roosevelt saying “Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing.”

The TR quote contains a certain amount of inspiring industriousness and bold purpose yet also underscores that the worthwhile work is a reward unto itself. On the other hand, it does seem incomplete given how important friends and family are.

The other example that comes to mind is an underlying thesis of “The Good Place,” a TV comedy that initially focuses on a woman named Eleanor Shellstrop who finds herself placed by mistake in a heaven-like afterlife and ultimately decides to work to earn her place with the help of her friends.

The TV series had many developments that shouldn’t be spoiled, so I will simply say that, during the third season episode “Jeremy Bearimy,” there was a point where Eleanor and her friends learned something that prevented them from making any further progress and would ultimately condemn them to The Bad Place, the horrendous-but-not-exactly-hell  final destination in the show’s universe.

Over the course of the episode, Eleanor and her friends have different reactions to this life-altering news. These reactions fall along different ethical theories including virtue ethics, consequentialism, deontology and nihilism. (Those theories are also explored in the nonfiction book “How to Be Perfect,” written by the series creator Michael Schur.)

Ultimately, Eleanor convinces her friends to accept that their fates are set, but they can work to do good and help their friends and families — whose fates haven’t yet been determined.

“Why not try?” Eleanor said. “It’s better than not trying, right?”

In his book, Schur goes into considerable detail about many ethical theories but reaches a conclusion in the coda in the form of a letter to his young children on using the wisdom from these ideas to make better decisions.

“Though their ideas vary widely, they’re all based on the simple concept that who we are and what we do matters,” Schur wrote. “That we should care whether we’re doing something good or not, and thus try to do the best things we can.”

Despite the book’s title, Schur acknowledges that people aren’t perfect but we can learn from mistakes, keep improving and do the best we can.

I know I’ve fallen short in a lot of things in my life, including trying to find words of comfort to someone in need on a bus or railcar. However, as long as I can keep trying (and have the wisdom to know I should keep trying), I feel like I’m moving in the right direction.

NHL players needed in the Olympics

There has been some talk about the National Hockey League not participating in the Olympics after this year. The National Hockey League has only agreed to provide players through the Vancouver Games. And, according to numerous sources like the CBC, the league hasn’t committed to future tournaments.

As a fan, the Olympic tournament offers many more pluses for the sport of hockey, the NHL, the players and for the fans.

If it wasn’t for the Olympics, I may not be interested in hockey until the Stanley Cup playoffs begin in mid-April. I think the NHL season is already too long to sustain a general fan’s interest — it lasts three-quarters of a year, for crying out loud. A relatively short, two-week tournament is a great tonic to a 82-game slog.

The Games are a great showcase for hockey. I’ve watched more games in the past three days of the Games than I have in the past three months. In the early rounds, there are lots of games on the air (and they don’t air at 9 a.m. on Sunday, iike many of NBC’s weekly NHL games). Some of them turned into nail biters, like Thursday’s Canada-Switzerland squeaker.

The players also seem to enjoy playing in the tournament. There seems to be a much different attitude now than when the professionals were first introduced during the 1998 Nagano Games when Team USA players trashed their rooms after an early exit. At least, I hope there is a better attitude.

The benefits to the NHL seem less direct. NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman says the league’s presence in the Games is primarily because it helps “our game.” I would definitely think it helps build the global audience for hockey. Building such an audience is something the NHL has been working on for years — at least that’s why I think the league opened its season in Europe for the third year in a row.

The NHL does have some valid concerns — including the possibility of player injuries affecting a team’s playoff prospects — and they are putting a lot on the line in the form of the players. The worries about injury also concern columnists in Chicago and Sacramento.

Some of the possible discussion points — such as a greater say in the tangled web of Olympic broadcasting rights — may create complications that may make the Gordian knot seem like a Sudoku puzzle on Monday.

While some of these concerns may be daunting, I hope the league and the international hockey federation find a way to work together to keep the players in future tournaments.

The airing of Vancouver Olympic grievances – a list

I’m generally enjoying the Vancouver Games as it enters the seventh day of competition, but some things are sticking in my mind. Please share your “grievances” in the comments.

The fence around the Olympic Flame: I think the organizers were caught flatfooted by the fact that people may want to be close to the beautiful outdoor Olympic Cauldron. At the very least, the image of a chainlink fence in front of a symbol of peaceful competition is disconcerting.

Kudos for the organizers for making changes and creating more viewing opportunities (according to this CBC News article). However, I didn’t necessarily care for one of the organizers’ excuses:

Organizers said the cauldron is far closer to the public than Olympic flames of past Games, where they’ve usually been located in or atop stadiums.

The cauldron at the 1996 Atlanta Games was outside Centennial Olympic Stadium and it was generally accessible to the public (at the very least it wasn’t blocked by a massive fence). I remember having lunch and taking photos mere yards from that Olympic Flame along with many spectators and families.

The Lack of Curling on NBC: This is a minor gripe at most, but it is sad when FOX has more curling on a 30-minute episode of “The Simpsons” than NBC will have in two weeks on its main network. Yes, curling is available on cable channels (that I don’t have) and is streaming live online (which I don’t have access to because I don’t have the right cable package). In recent years, curling almost always gets praised as a pleasant surprise of the Games. Maybe it’s not a primetime event, but it’s lame that NBC couldn’t find time to at least air the gold metal match on broadcast (like in the afternoon).

Shoddy online coverage: There’s a huge difference between the online coverage of the 2008 Beijing Games and in Vancouver. Just two years ago, many non-marquee events were streamed live and in their entirety. Now, it’s mostly hockey and curling aired live (with other events posted after NBC has aired them in primetime). Hockey and curling are both fine sports, but the offerings are like night and day.

Tape Delay: It’s a gripe as old as NBC’s coverage of the Games. It is certainly frustrating that NBC insists on starting its primetime program right at 8 p.m. (7 p.m. Central) even though there are live events taking place at 5 p.m. Vancouver time. And, of course, Vancouver time is the same time as Chico and the entire West Coast which just compounds the silliness.

NBC didn’t have to do this. It could have emulated a model from Canada that I thought could work fairly well here. In previous games, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation would air its primetime program live nationwide. After the end of that broadcast, the CBC would offer a special West Coast-only highlight package to help round out the night. I don’t know what the current Canadian broadcaster, CTV, is doing.

Media coverage of “the glitches”: I’m sure some of the criticism of the Vancouver organizing committee’s operation of the Games is justified, but the howling has seemed ferocious at times. The situation has drawn many comparisons to the Atlanta Games in 1996 when the media lambasted ACOG’s miscues, particularly regarding transportation (as this 1996 New York Times article details).

The disconcerting thing about the Atlanta criticism and the Vancouver gripes is that these woes somehow become part of the “legacy” of the Games. I was in Atlanta for the Games, and the woes weren’t my “highlight” of those Olympics. Yes, it wasn’t pleasant at times — I had to brave the crushing crowds on MARTA and I once had to give directions and a map to a bus driver so we could get to our destination. However, it pales in comparison to witnessing the opening ceremonies, watching track stars break world records and enjoying some of the finest art and music in my life.

Bruce Arthur of the National Post offers a nice perspective on the criticism. While acknowledging that Vancouver has been far from perfect, Arthur points out how there are at least three different views of the Games:

There is the Olympics that we in the media experience, the one the athletes experiences, and the one the public experiences. But only one of us write the verdict on the Olympics in question.

For another take on the Olympics’ legacy on host cities, The Independent looked at how cities capitalized on the infrastructure changes made for the Games. Atlanta seemed to fare much better on that score and I hope Vancouver does too.